Phoenix Marie orders her slaves for delivery by phone. When they are arrive they are completely bound and encased like a package. Phoenix drags her new slave around before opening it up to see its face and cock. he is told to lick her pussy and ass and when he does not do a good job his balls are tied up and his feet are punished with the riding crop.
Phoenix uses his hard cock for her own pleasure but even in that department he could use a lesson, so is tied spread-legged and fucked with her strapon cock like a little bitch. In the end he crawls around with a pigs tail sticking out of his ass, grunting and squealing like an animal.
Third comment on the site = not much experience (have to check other shoots!). I agree both with Scott, and with the four enthusiasts. I know why. For the roles are very unbalanced! Phoenix monopolizes the humanity in the shoot, verbally clever, the only one to speak really ; and active, the only one to give input into motion. Mark, symbolically, is a package man (clip 1), then a mute one (glass cock into mouth, clip 2), finally a non-verbal pig (clip 3). So, I wonder why male subs would have to be “passive males” and non human stuff in B/g scenes, unable to have intersubjectivity with the domme?
They are opaque, as if their mind retracted under the body shape, while erotic masochist scenes might show, either the desire from a man to be domed by a woman (perversion), or the hate to be domed converted involuntarily into pleasure to be on the road (seduction). Phoenix has a strong presence as a ruler, displaying threat and cruelty, but she is the only one acting. On a sort of concrete bag. So the question is : are male subs on the market always “going through the motions”, at play level, as a rule?
Have they to be trained, to come out of the cavern ages of ******* towards human age of mind perversity? Or is there actors actually ready to play the male subs as true human beings? I admit degradation off gender pretension to dome as men as a rule, but I need that it makes sense.